PC Tips and Tricks to make your life easier

IPhone 4 – How Good Is It?

August 28, 2010 By: lilybird Category: iPhone/iPod

A few short years ago, Apple sat on top of the smartphone world relatively unchallenged. As time has passed, other manufacturers have pumped money into their own development programs and closed the gap considerably between Apple’s flagship iPhone and their own handsets. In an attempt to stand head and shoulders above the competition once more, Apple has unleashed the iPhone 4.

One of the changes found in the iPhone 4 is on the inside of the phone. The iPhone 4’s predecessor, the 3GS contained a Samsung-based Cortex CPU. This has been replaced by Apple’s own A4 chip, the same one used by the iPad. The iPhone 4 does not quite speed along at the same rate as the 1GHz available to the iPad, but it is still more than fast enough. It brings up graphics quickly and navigates seamlessly. Those who find it too slow are likely looking for something to complain about.

Those quickly-rendered graphics are displayed on a 3.5 inch screen with 960 x 640 pixel resolution. Combine that with a mind-numbing 326 ppi pixel density and you have a display that is absolutely second to none. The incredible resolution makes up for any shortcomings in size, and it has even earned the name of Retina Display. It is so named due to the claim that it presents graphics in more detail than the human eye is able to distinguish. It may seem like overkill to present clarity that the user can’t see anyway, but at least consumers need not worry about a less than stellar display. In fact, many testes of the iPhone 4 have stated that the Retina Display easily provides the sharpest images they’ve yet seen.

With a display so sharp, one would hope that Apple has improved on the rather weak 3 megapixel camera found on older models. They have, as the iPhone 4 features a 5 megapixel camera with a backside-illuminated sensor that is more light-sensitive. The LED flash is one of the smaller sizes and can blow out some photos, but the iPhone takes terrific photos in low light and without a flash.

Finally, Apple has decided that it is time to produce a phone that allows multitasking. Though not backgrounding in the strictest sense of the word, the iPhone lets some APIs that imitate backgrounding to run simultaneously. Critics will cry foul, but for regular, everyday users, it is just fine. Until now, Apple has stated that their smartphones would suffer battery drain by performing multitasking. The iPhone 4 has cleared up any potential issue here, as it has been known to produce almost 40 hours of normal use in some tests.

Apple has once again set the bar in smartphone technology with the iPhone 4. With its unmatched Retina Display and high performance, the iPhone has placed Apple first in many consumers’ minds. Customers will be more than pleased with what the iPhone 4 has to offer.

IPhone Vs. Everybody: Battle Of The Smartphone Death Grips

August 10, 2010 By: lilybird Category: iPhone/iPod

When reports began flooding in that Apple’s new iPhone 4 suffers from a serious antenna problem that disrupts voice and data signals, Apple fired back at its critics and competitors by claiming that all smartphones have the same issue. But do they? To see how common a problem antenna attenuation is, we took the iPhone 4 and five of its top smartphone competitors into the field to put Apple’s claims to the test. Here’s what we found.

How We Tested

We tested five smartphones that compete with the iPhone 4: the HTC Nexus One (T-Mobile), the HTC EVO 4G (Sprint; not on 4G), the RIM BlackBerry Bold 9650 (Sprint), the Motorola Droid X (Verizon), and the Samsung Vibrant (AT&T). First we measured each model’s signal strength when held normally. Then we tested each handset while holding it in its death grip–the position where our hand covered the phone’s antenna most effectively.

Because signal loss has far more severe real-world implications in environments where cellular coverage is already poor, we decided to test in a weak signal environment that we had previously identified in our ongoing testing of 3G network performance. The location we chose was Crestline Drive (Google Earth), near San Francisco’s Twin Peaks; we have consistently obtained poor coverage from all four of the major networks at this location.

We measured signal strength in decibels per milliwatt (dBm), a standard way of expressing the power of a radio signal in relation to 1 milliwatt. In high-signal areas–for example, in locations where a smartphone user stands close to a cell tower–a signal measured at -51 dBm is the highest (and best) that can be achieved. In poor coverage areas, phones can connect and hold a call until the signal weakens to approximately -113, at which point the call drops and the network connection fails.

To measure the real-world implications of signal loss, we tested both data speed performance and voice call quality. For data speed, we used the FCC-endorsed Ookla testing app to measure upload speeds and download speeds. We ran three consecutive speed tests on each phone at each location, and then picked the best upload and download speeds of the three.

The voice-call tests were more subjective. We placed calls to a common local number, listening for static, jitter, delay, dropped calls, or failure to connect.

We stress that these tests are informal, nonscientific and by no means definitive. Nevertheless, we believe that we got a very good look at the death grip in action, and a reasonably good idea of how legitimate Steve Jobs’s statements at the Antenna-gate press conference were.

Signal Loss Results

In its earlier tests of signal loss of the iPhone 4 when held, AnandTech found that the iPhone lost about 24 dBm of signal strength. In high signal areas, AnandTech surmised, the IPhone 4 can sustain a loss of 24 dBm and still maintain a clear voice call and a high-speed data connection. But in low signal areas, that level of signal loss can reduce the signal to a point where calls degrade and drop.

So 24 dBm is the magic number–the standard measurement of the death grip’s effect on the iPhone, and the benchmark we used in looking at the phones we informally tested. Our results for signal loss due to death grip appear in the chart below. (Please click on the thumbnail to see the full-size chart).

We measured death-grip signal loss by comparing the signal strength (in dBm) of each phone when held “normally” (flat in hand) to the corresponding signal strength (also in dBm) of the phone when held in a death grip (blocking the phone’s antenna).

In our “weak signal” location, the Samsung Captivate on AT&T’s service had the greatest amount of signal loss–even when we held the phone loosely at its bottom (where the phone’s antenna is located). The Captivate incurred a 37 percent decrease in signal, dropping from -81 to -111 dBm.

The HTC EVO was the next-most strongly affected by the death grip: Its dBm reading dropped from -87 to -101 dBm, a loss of 16 percent of signal strength–still far less than the Samsung suffered.

The Nexus One and the Motorola Droid X each lost marginal amounts of signal strength in their respective death grips, with declines of 6.2 percent and 3.9 percent, respectively–nothing approaching the iPhone 4’s loss.

Oddly, the death grip actually improved the signal strength of the RIM BlackBerry Bold, which jumped 12.15 percent when we held it with our fingers tight at both edges of the phone.

Data Download Speeds

To understand the implications of the death grip on various phones, we looked for data speed decreases that seemed to result from it. We tested data speed loss on all phones except the BlackBerry Bold and obtained the results listed in the chart below (the Ookla test is not available from BlackBerry App World, and the alternative speed test application we used produced wildly inaccurate results). (Please click the thumbnail to see the full-size chart).

informal tests of the iPhone 4′s performance when held in its death grip, which we conducted when the phone had just come out.

Voice Call Tests

For another look at death-grip implications, we conducted some limited voice-call tests, listening for dropped calls or for calls with noticeable static or delay. Of all the phones in our tests, only the iPhone 4, the HTC Nexus One, and the Samsung Captivate showed significant signs of call quality degradation as a result of the death grip. Calls on all three phones sounded garbled, and on two of the phones–the Nexus One and the iPhone 4–we experienced dropped calls.

Unlikely Death Grips

Though it seems entirely plausible that an iPhone 4 user might hold the device in such a way that the grip would interfere with the antenna and reduce the phone’s signal strength, the various death grips required to attenuate the antennas of the other phones we tested seem far less likely in the real world.

For instance, the death grip for the EVO 4G involves cupping your hand around the top of the phone. You wouldn’t purposely hold your phone like this; it feels very awkward and makes accidentally hitting the volume buttons on the phone’s spine much more likely. Even more unnatural is the death grip for the Droid X: We had to use a two hands to grasp the bottom and the top of the phone simultaneously. Other death grips, though a little less exotic, still felt decidedly artificial.

Part of the reason the iPhone is different is that Apple built its antenna into the metal housing that forms the outside edge of the phone. This represents a dramatic departure from the way most antennas are built into phones–namely, inside the shell and usually at the bottom of the phone. As a result, the iPhone 4’s exposed antenna is much more susceptible to interference (attenuation) from the hand of the person holding the phone. This risky (and apparently not fully tested) design move now looks like an epic fail–a cautionary tale that will be retold at drafting tables for years to come.

The Bottom Line

Apple’s assertion that antenna attenuation is a common problem on smartphones is clearly true. Every one of the phones we tested experienced some degree of attenuation when held firmly in a position that covered the device’s antenna. On the other hand, our informal tests indicate that different phone models do not exhibit attenuation to the same degree–and the iPhone 4 performed far worse when attenuated than did most of its competitors in our tests. Most significantly, the iPhone 4–almost certainly because of its “innovative” external antenna–was the only phone we tested that has a distinct (and easily reachable) weak spot capable of ending a call with a single touch.

People who are surfing for more information about Free Traffic System, then check out the web page that is quoted in this line.


The Wait Is Almost Over Introducing The IPhone 4

July 05, 2010 By: lilybird Category: iPhone/iPod

The long anticipated Apple iPhone 4 was recently unveiled in San Francisco by Apple’s founder, Steve Jobs, and has a diversity of features which will make it appeal to a variety of new and old users, as well as possibly reinventing the perception of the pda phone. The immediate difference which many will notice is the new iPhone 4 size, which can boast a 25 percent size decrease over earlier models of the iPhone, down to a mere 0.37 inch width. The new iPhone Retina display boasts an amazing 960×640 pixel resolution, which Apple founder Steve Jobs claims is a higher resolution than can even be perceived by the human eye, and offers smoother lines for graphics and gaming, as well as heightened details. This Apple Retina 3.5 inch display has 4 times as many pixels per inch as the old iPhone 3GS, as well as a whopping 800:1 contrast ratio, also 4 times as much as the iPhone 3GS. Due to the crisper display it would be ideal to protect the lcd screen from scratches. You can find iPhone 4 accessories that’ll protect your investment as well as your high resolutions screen.

The iPhone camera has undergone a major change with the Apple iPhone 4 as well. The old rear facing camera is still there, but for added versatility, Apple has added a 5 megapixel front facing camera as well, and both of these are equipped with LED flash and the ability to record 720p video with photo and video geotagging capabilities. These new features will be integrated smoothly into the iOS4 operating system to be launched with this phone, which can even run multiple third-party apps at the same time, a step up from its predecessors. Just like the older iphones, the iphone 4 will require to sync up with itunes using an iPhone 4 data cable to connect with a pc. Other available multitasking abilities consist of Voice over IP, background audio streaming, fast app switching, background location, and push notifications. The new video call feature with FaceTime has already awed tech critics, not so much because of its originality, but with the seamless way this feature has been incorporated into the iOS4 operating system.

Software upgrades are not the only features new to the iPhone 4, however. The improved battery will allow users to enjoy over 7 hours of talk time on 3G, 10 hours of web-surfing using wifi, 6 hours of web use on 3G, 10 hours of video watching, 40 hours of audio capacity, or 300 standby hours, making it the longest lasting battery available on the mobile phone market. Accessories such as the iPhone 4 external battery charger will keep your phone powered even longer. The processor for the new iPhone 4 is a vast improvement as well. This processor is the same iOS 4 processor as seen in the iPad, which puts it a cut above the old iPhone 3GS. The multi-axis gyroscope finally allows for the iPhone to process both velocity and orientation at once, which could lead to a revolution in phone gaming by utilizing the unique precision these three axes can allow programmers and gamers alike.